Re: [dhcwg] [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-02

[Ted Lemon <mellon@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 30, 2017, at 5:20 PM, jouni.nospam <jouni.nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Now if I decide to implement rfc3315bis *with* security, follow all musts in Section 20.1, and listed “updates” in the header, I have still no guarantee whether I can interoperate with another rfc3315bis implementation because it decided to follow relay-server-security. That is not good.

Thanks.   This is the clarification I was looking for.