Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Pete Resnick <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:57:18 +0200
Cc: IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3D185F8B-DB62-40BF-B451-C7D6722C8717@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <148474911031.2261.11881119527780959351.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <875519DD-685D-4642-A1D4-0F5D82502E21@piuha.net> <3D185F8B-DB62-40BF-B451-C7D6722C8717@qti.qualcomm.com>

Pete:

Thanks for your careful read and comparisons.

I have read through your suggestions and agree with all of them.

Jari

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

References:
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice
  - From: Pete Resnick

Prev by Date: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Next by Date: RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]