Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Saifi Khan <saifi.khan@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
From
: Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:51:28 -0500
Cc
: Dave Burstein <daveb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
20170130183846.21994.qmail@server322.com
>
References
: <
CAAUuzMQwk5v+3HA+KFrsCZfbNSXFpgBE0XdKfJWHgDss9-VkTw@mail.gmail.com
> <
20170130183846.21994.qmail@server322.com
>
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2017, at 13:38, Saifi Khan <
saifi.khan@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
No !
The IETF and its members must stay focussed on what the IETF is for and what it's goals are.
That is getting harder?
https://m.facebook.com/kakooch/posts/10157996268225018?pnref=story
One of the ICANN board members misses both an ICANN and IETF meeting due to the ban.
There will be more.
Follow-Ups
:
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
From:
Jari Arkko
References
:
If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
From:
Dave Burstein
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
From:
Saifi Khan
Prev by Date:
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Next by Date:
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Previous by thread:
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Next by thread:
Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]