On 29/01/2017 12:29, Paul Wouters wrote:
...
> And while most will agree there is nothing to be done for Chicago,
> I think it would be prudent for the IAOC to look into alternatives for
> IETF-102 next year which is currently scheduled to be in San Francisco,
> as well as take this new information into consideration when deciding
> venues for 2019-2020.
Which is *exactly* why getting to consensus on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
is the most urgent matter, and it's happening at mtgvenue@xxxxxxxx right now.
Brian