Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-?? Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2017-01-28 IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-21 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This is a well written document with a couple of nits. It would be helpful to the reader interested in the concept, but unfamiliar with DNS if there was some minor additional clarification regarding EDNS0. Major issues: None Minor issues: RFC4301 is an unused reference. Is it missing from the text? ===== By negotiating an EDNS0 option which allowed them to self-populate this data,..... SB> Calling up EDNS0 (which really needs expanding) comes out of the SB> blue and could use a reference and sentence of explanation SB> at least for those not familiar with the detail of DNS. Nits/editorial comments: [RFC7624] in the Abstract should be changed to RFC7624 ========= 1. Introduction .... exploited in the attacks document in [RFC7258] and the threats s/document/documented/