Re: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry Acee, I accidentally deleted your message about paths that support this.

Yes, to get the best quality time transfer you would pick paths such that all hops had the property. If you did not do that you can undo all the good work you did on the other hops by one that introduces variable delay. Indeed if the variability has certain systematic characteristics it can be very hard to use other techniques to minimise its impact on the quality of the time transfer. An example of a characteristic that is very difficult to address by other means is a very slowly increasing delay.

Stewart




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]