Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jurgen,
I apologize for confusion, been thinking of Port ID. Indeed, the Interface ID is local ID and used in case of unnumbered interface as described in section 4.7.1.3:
   Interface ID
      The identifier assigned to the link by the node specified by the Node ID.
Thus it MAY be SNMP' IfIndex , as you've pointed out. The document leaves it to the implementation.

Regards,
Greg


On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:11:57AM -0800, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> >
> > - Does the Interface ID related to other interface numbers, e.g.,
> >   SNMP's ifIndex? Or is this an entirely separate number space? Or
> >   does it depend on the implementor's choice?
> >
> GIM>> This comes from PTP. AFAIK, it is different from SNMP index.
>

If this is specifically a PTP Interface ID, it might be desirable to
be explicit about this and that it may be different from other numeric
interface IDs. (This is what I heard you saying, I do not know much
about PTP and surely not any details how PTP defines Interface IDs.

/js

PS: This was actually the only operational comment I had. From an
    operational perspective, it is important to know whether interface
    numbers us a common or possibly different numbering scheme.

--
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]