Andrew, > On Jan 10, 2017, at 12:19 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 08:44:49AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Sorry, but I find the replacement of "IANA" by "IANA Services" throughout >> the draft to be both ugly and plain wrong. > > Well, we need something other than "IANA", because the IETF is but one > user of that mark, and the license that the IETF Trust gave to PTI > does not permit them to refer to themselves as "IANA”. Well, according to their web site, they are still “IANA”. See: http://www.iana.org It says: "The global coordination of the DNS Root, IP addressing, and other Internet protocol resources is performed as the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) functions.” If their web page can abbreviate this as “IANA”, then I think we can as well. Bob > > Would "IANA Services Operator" do? > >> But it doesn't matter: this document is about what IANA does. > > I think that's not quite correct. It's about what the IANA Services > Operator for the protocol parameters registries (and other registries > for which the IETF is policy authority) does. > > Best regards, > > A > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail