"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Looking at the problem of time smear, I think Google's 20 hour as opposed
> to 24 hours approach is probably best.
Google plan to switch from 20h leap smear to 24h
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode