Re: multihoming, was IPv10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Segment Routing is as much source routing as RSVP-TE would be, there’s no per hop SA lookup, but rather per FEC (that could be a SA) at the ingress.
Ability to abstract next hop into higher layer, locally resolvable entity (adj-sid -> node->sid -> anycast-sid -> etc) provides a rather viable from a network design and implementation way to have end2end networking while utilizing local state.
 
Cheers,
Jeff
 

On 12/31/16, 04:22, "ietf on behalf of Stewart Bryant" <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    
    
    On 31/12/2016 07:54, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
    > On 12/30/2016 02:20 PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
    >
    >> I wrote:
    >>
    >>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ohta-e2e-multihoming-00
    >>
    >> in April 2000 and I know it is stupid to use source routing for
    >> multihoming.
    > Is source routing bad in general or is it bad only in multihoming scenarios?
    >
    > Thanks.
    >
    
    When called segment routing it is accepted as a useful technology for  
    well defined problems of this type.
    
    - Stewart
    
    






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]