Reviewer: Fernando Gont Review result: Ready with Nits ** Technical ** * Section 3, pages 3-4: > Intended algorithm for mcpttq is queuing. > > New Warning code: No. > > New SIP response code: No. Is this kind of thing really needed/required in the registry? ** Editorial ** * Section 1, page 2: > The third generation partnership project (3GPP) May be you should capitalize these? (i.e., "Third Generation...") * Section 1, page 2: > In addition to this a commercial PTT > service for non-professional use (e.g., groups of people on holiday) Please insert a comma after "this". * Section 1, page 3: > MCPTT data transfer currently under development can > benefit from a queueing mechanism. "data transfer..." protocols? * Section 2, page 3: > The use of this namespace outside such network is > undefined. s/network/networks/ * Section 5, page 5: > 5. IANA Considerations > > Abiding by the rules established within [RFC4412] and [RFC7134], this > is an Informative RFC registering two new namespaces, their > associated priority-values, and intended algorithms. s/registering/creating/ ?