Hi Peter, > On 10 Dec 2016, at 19:32, Peter Yee <peter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Peter Yee > Review result: Ready with Nits > > This draft is looking better than the first two. It's in line with > the other structured syntax suffix drafts. The only comment I have > is: > > Page 4, IANA Considerations, Contact name: The description of that > email address (art@xxxxxxxx) is “Applications and Real-Time Area > Discussion”, not "Applications and Real-Time Area Working Group". > It’s not a WG that I am aware of. Did you want this to use this > address or might you prefer appsawg? APPSAWG is listed as the “ART > Area General Applications Working Group”. RFC 6839 references “Apps > Area Working Group (apps-discuss@xxxxxxxx)” in its IANA Considerations > section, so I can see how you might have gotten to what you used, but > I don't think that's correct. Give some consideration to the right > name and email address for this item and the Author/Change controller. apps-discuss@ is an alias for art@ (ART Area mailing list), so I think the latter is the right email to use.