Re: IPv10.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPv10.
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:01:33 +0900
Cc: "ipv6@xxxxxxxx" <ipv6@xxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <HE1PR04MB144939A28C2E3052402511A8BDBC0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HE1PR04MB144939A28C2E3052402511A8BDBC0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Where's the draft?

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi everyone,

Is there anything we can add to the IPv10 draft or the standard will be the same as the draft?

Best regards,

Khaled Omar

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPv10.
  - From: Tim Chown

References:
- IPv10.
  - From: Khaled Omar

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: RFC7344 Automating DNSSEC Delegation Trust Maintenance to standards track
Next by Date: Re: IPv10.
Previous by thread: IPv10.
Next by thread: Re: IPv10.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]