Re: IPv10.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Khaled I read your blog post and are curious to see what value we gain in trying to save the IPv4 pool.
Correct me if I didn't understand the problem you are addressing with this new IP standard.


On Nov 11, 2016 17:08, "Khaled Omar" <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all IETF members and the discussion panel,

 

Hope you are all fine,

 

I wish I’m not bothering you by my e-mails, but all what I’m asking you is to find a free time on your calendars so we can discuss, suggest, and participate in making the final version of the IPv10 draft and start experimenting its work, and once it will work efficiently and we find that it will bring a great value to the Internet, it can be standardized by the IETF.

 

I’m not in rush in this sequence of work (maybe you have another sequence as I’m new to the IETF mailing list) but I’m curious to receive comments, suggestions, and modifications that will make a progress and eventually bring a value to the Internet.

 

Thanks for welcoming me,  

 

Best regards,

 

Khaled Omar


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@xxxxxxxx
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]