Re: Options for temporary operational solution to DMARC problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > If the IESG believes that even though we've had this problem for 2 1/2
    > years, we need to do something about it NOW NOW NOW rather than waiting
    > a few more months for ARC, I strongly recommend the per-sender rewrite.

We've had serious problems for 2 + years, and we've been told "wait a few
months" multiple times now.  I can live with any temporary solution, as long
as deploying ARC is our clear goal.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]