-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, November 4, 2016 8:43 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > There is another option: the people who live in a p=reject policy regime > could use a different email address for IETF participation. It's not a > choice I like very much though. Been there, done that. It has quite a few nasty side effects. You easily end up also sending work related e-mail from a non-corporate account, for example when you forward an email from a WG list to a colleague at work. That's against many companies' internal policies. Thinks about consequences for example during legal actions, when the opposing party wants to discover all mail related to a particular topic. Does using a parallel server amounts to willful hiding of documents? Are you in contempt of court? Should you store your personal mail on company server so it can be searched? Bottom line, that's indeed not a choice I like much either. - -- Christian Huitema -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using gpg4o v5.0.7.7563 - http://www.gpg4o.com/ Charset: utf-8 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYHhUIAAoJELba05IUOHVQSX4H/22Np5iTJdf5F9N10Y9vVBCJ a/rqPQwK9DzvdDQRlJFA+Kn6+PRGPK4siI6Nx6eYo578t7WMJUCYFwRX0YJBRZAm Y8kYBdO5QS/h2U0px67FEyZxask3gsoCW+gPZK1l6ER8ygcTaC3zlKxxbLgUFzXz 8tEIisUr7Xo9y497RKBVzIIpIFZ0wQtH2GipGfFU4p3LOKISnwnUugHePHU3Wt5F 0NLoUVn7c58A40o/B5k2rty2u3q+1m5JUq5iDDMwhumY/qoXvt1D6Ka6m8CkCRZA OG+xFC62aKIv6IM4D6DlU34fEDt8sxWkGGXb5rIlemlUCItJWKLccyqyFH7wi+Q= =H+SS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----