Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09.txt> (Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What method is in place to ensure that the cache is, #1, checked before emitting priming queries, #2, that if there is already data (complete or partial) in the cache, how is the client supposed to determine if the cached data is preferred over unverified, remote data?  Or does the client operate with the presumption that local data is always wrong and the best data is always external?

Inquiring Minds want to know.

/Wm

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 7:57 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
(dnsop) to consider the following document:
- 'Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries'
  <draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09.txt> as Best Current Practice

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2016-11-10. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   This document describes the queries that a DNS resolver should emit
   to initialize its cache.  The result is that the resolver gets both a
   current NS RRSet for the root zone and the necessary address
   information for reaching the root servers.




The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


The document contains these normative downward references.
See RFC 3967 for additional information:
    rfc5452: Measures for Making DNS More Resilient against Forged Answers (Proposed Standard - IETF stream)
    rfc4033: DNS Security Introduction and Requirements (Proposed Standard - IETF stream)
    rfc3226: DNSSEC and IPv6 A6 aware server/resolver message size requirements (Proposed Standard - IETF stream)
Note that some of these references may already be listed in the acceptable Downref Registry.


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]