Re: And so it begins? SPF failure on self

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Maybe, since we all have admission-test tokens for our subscriptions,
we could be allowed to whitelist things we know we live behind? I
think any spammer motivated enough to subscribe to an IETF list *and*
drive the whitelist engine, deserves our attention..

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Using my redhat.com address, I replied to a draft alias email address
> that includes myself, and the ietf mail server rejected the message
> to me (or at least I hope the others still got it)
>
> Is this a new ietf.org mail "feature" or did something on my redhat.com
> end change?
>
> Is there a way to make the email processing server at ietf.org a little
> smarter to not check SPF for outgoing mails that were expanded by
> itself?
>
> Paul
>




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]