Stephen,
On 2016-09-12 13:40, Stephen Farrell wrote:
On 12/09/16 12:23, Loa Andersson wrote:
Stephen,
Errata that does not attract interest could do so for many reasons. I
think we at least should make up our mind if they should be rejected.
If they are not they at least should be held for a future bis.
That is reasonable, assuming "we" is the set of folks reading this
thread.
Well - yes. But also if you are (the former) wg chair or the shepherd
for a document that have an errata listed I think that it is in your
own interest to have that errata responded to.
/Loa
S.
/Loa
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 sep. 2016, at 12:15, Stephen Farrell
<stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/09/16 10:56, Loa Andersson wrote:
The ADs might have to point to someone to resolve the (oldest)
errata. Or errata that belong to closed wg's.
FWIW, for my WGs, I follow the practice of handling any errata for
which someone shows interest. So if there're any that need to be
processed, then please ping me, and/or a relevant mailing list and
I'll take action. If, OTOH, nobody is interested, then that is also
true of me:-)
While other ADs may be more proactive than me, I think it's true
that if pinged, ADs will generally take action.
Cheers, S.
--
Loa Andersson email: loa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Senior MPLS Expert loa@xxxxx
Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64