> On Jun 3, 2016, at 9:26 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: … > The issue iirc is that if say RFCxxxx is obsoleting RFCyyyy > must the IANA considerations in RFCxxxx say that all the > registries that used point at RFCyyyy need to be updated to > point at RFCxxxx? I don't think that needs to be done (but > it can be done). I think Barry's position, and the text of > the 5226bis draft say that it has to be done. seems like a good make-work requirement with little actual benefit of course, if the details of the registry changed with the replacement RFC that is a different case Scott