My point, Adam, is that the choice is really who draws the short straw, for surely it will be drawn. On 5/24/16 7:08 PM, Adam Roach wrote: > On 5/24/16 11:37, Eliot Lear wrote: >> On 5/24/16 6:18 PM, Adam Roach wrote: >>> This shouldn't be that hard to think about. Would you have a greater >>> objection to the IETF selecting (1) a locale that allows private >>> citizen ownership of guns or (2) a country that refuses to recognize >>> Israeli passports? >> False choice. >> >> > > The question on the table in this sub-thread is: considering > governmental policies that some subset of participants find > objectionable (but which don't otherwise preclude meeting there), > whether nondiscriminatory ones pose a greater or lesser issue for IETF > venue selection than discriminatory ones. All I've done above is shift > the class being targeted. > > If you want to take this logic at a slower pace, start with Jordi's > original message listing six issues, except replace "LGBT Rights" with > "Recognition of Israeli passports"; follow it with my response > pointing out that #5 is different than the others; and then ask Yoav's > question. How do you respond? > > /a > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature