Re: Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Russ, sorry for missing this.  I have a pull request open against
my spec with the changes I've made.

https://github.com/martinthomson/drafts/pull/31

On 19 April 2016 at 05:35, Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Minor Concerns:
>
> I think it would really help
> the reader to say at the beginning something like: "The confidentiality
> protections ensure that media is protected from other applications, but
> the confidentiality protections do not extend to traffic on the data
> channels."

Yes, this is a good change.  I have adopted it.

> I understand why authentication and confidentiality are often used
> together.  However, it is very unclear to me why there ought to be a
> linkage between c-webrtc and authentication since this service really
> is only a promise to not share media with other applications.

I've trimmed down the text on authentication.  You are right that it
basically doesn't matter here.

> After reading the whole document, I went back and read the Abstract
> again.  I do not think it captures the real intent of the document.

I've taken a variation on your text.  I think that it's a better framing.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]