Thanks for your review, Peter. I do agree with this: > Page 5, section 4.2, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: The sentence states: > "Being part of the Router CAPABILITY TLV, the node administrative tag > sub-TLV MUST be reasonably small and stable." If you're going to make this > a MUST, you've got to at least give a definition of "reasonably small" and > perhaps even "stable" in the context of this specification. As it stands, > there's no test for whether the MUST is enforceable or understandable > between parties. Jari
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail