Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration (off-topic)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Corinne, Ted,
At 01:48 19-04-2016, Corinne Cath wrote:
Just a quick question: are you intending on providing feedback to the IAOC? If so, maybe it makes sense to coordinate a bit in order to prevent a duplication of entries? Or will it be useful if multiple people point out the same themes?

The IAOC Chair requested comments about a future IETF meeting in Paris (France), Montreal (Canada) or Copenhagen (Denmark) as the IAOC is considering whether the IETF can have a meeting in any of those countries. It probably doesn't make much of a difference whether there is duplication of entries except to the person(s) who will be reading the messages to venue-selection@xxxxxxxx to extract the points of concern.

At 05:02 19-04-2016, Ted Lemon wrote:
The IETF has a very strong tradition of commenting at length on the topic at hand and hoping either that IETF leadership will spend the time to review the whole thread and extract the salient points from it, or give up in despair. So what you are seeing here is very much the IETF tradition. Asking people to do better probably won't work, although it never hurts to try.

I read the 36 messages in this thread. Although some of the content is interesting, it does not look like the messages are directly related to the subject line. Even though two Area Directors read some of the messages, the discussion is on an unmanaged thread. It is more of an effort instead of a problem to extract the arguments made on this thread. The problem is what to suggest given that they may be related to multiple IETF policies.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]