-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, March 27, 2016 3:37 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > > Thanks for your review, Brian. > > The points you raise are good ones, and we need to deal with them > somehow. I would like to add another point to Brian's review. I am concerned that the "General Policy," as stated in section 3.1, does not really present the IETF consensus. The current text says: In all matters relating to Intellectual Property Rights, the intent is to benefit the Internet community and the public at large, while respecting the legitimate rights of others. This is a bit misleading. The actual IETF approach is delineated in section 7, where it is explained that working group members are carefully weighting tradeoffs between the potential benefits of using a patented technology, and the potential impediments caused by licensing terms, or the uncertainty about licensing conditions. The purpose of early disclosure is to help working groups make informed decisions as early as possible, by opposition to investing a lot of effort on a particular design before learning about the IPR existence. Pretty much the entire policy derives from that. So maybe it should be stated upfront! - -- Christian Huitema -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using gpg4o v3.5.53.6558 - http://www.gpg4o.com/ Charset: utf-8 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJW+HHvAAoJELba05IUOHVQmlMIAJ9l+JURhPmVzlOzwbHp+fb7 +/kP/nfUa6+1bOmzSnf9QsDHBUV9Yf86/3Zd4KyQ9V8xx/eoxCbhe7fZwZ+wBsrX ohMbsk2ofURpjP97P+dWG3RxIiJofCptOYY+6P7OubJSrGXXN0t4nHee6MHeUZmR /2DiQQje2Goqyza2hFRhsBawmH0LyeCFjkaS+hEToSoKHuTvh+TuZwrO6+ypRmow G4yvTgUYDWVTsqoibfoaHZOEUT2P8MG4s1q0ax7lAEIL1Lrny7PHY4JtXKDm5Iwc DJ1QTgBc7iOegHZMzkK0oUvx/kY0Bnko6a5t3E3OyDw2kvFyNdwGQU9bKr6q3Eo= =jKNR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----