Re: Is Fragmentation at IP layer even needed ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Den 09. feb. 2016 06:01, skrev Yoav Nir:
> 
>> On 9 Feb 2016, at 1:20 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Ronald Bonica wrote:
>>>> The words "many" and "some" don't do justice to the conversation.  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world-02 provides more concrete numbers from real-world observation.
>>>
>>> Ah, but the result is much simpler.
>>>
>>> Some other real world data (Google QUIC experiments) already tell us
>>> that a sizable part of the Internet (was it 7 %?) is not reachable via
>>> UDP at all.  This just ups that number slightly for IPv6 and UDP
>>> protocols that don't have their own segmentation.
>>>
>>> UDP, it was nice to have known you.
>>
>> Maybe what we needed all along was a better TCP that allowed data to
>> be sent on the first packet.
> 
> And could be stateless on the server
> 
> And you could get the same size data as the other side sent you without adding your own message layer.
> 
> Yoav
> 
> 

Never forget that five packets are required.

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1093283&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F26%2F23863%2F01093283.pdf%3Farnumber%3D1093283




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]