Re: wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> This seems to me to be clearly "updating" or "profiling" RFC6125 normative
> language, in the specific email use case.

Profiling it for email, yes.  Why should that make it *update* the
document that specifies the general process?  Profiles need to
normatively reference what they profile, but not the other way 'round.

Barry




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]