> On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:08 AM, Alexey Eromenko <al4321@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:52 PM, John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >2. What kind of UDP applications use such big packets, over 1280 bytes ? > > >Um, the DNS with EDNS0, and particularly with DNSSEC? Is this a trick question? > > > Yes. > The trick lies right there in IPv6 specification: > > "A node must be able to accept a fragmented packet that, after > reassembly, is as large as 1500 octets." > ... which is not much greater than 1280 bytes defined as minimum MTU for IPv6. > > Basically, Fragmentation, as specified in RFC-2460 (IPv6), solves the problem ONLY for packet-sized between 1280 and 1500 bytes. Which is why I doubt if it is useful at all. That’s the minimum required implementation, which guarantees that you can send at least a basic ethernet sized packet to any host. What is omitted in the above qoute is next 2 sentences: "A node is permitted to accept fragmented packets that reassemble to more than 1500 octets. An upper-layer protocol or application that depends on IPv6 fragmentation to send packets larger than the MTU of a path should not send packets larger than 1500 octets unless it has assurance that the destination is capable of reassembling packets of that larger size.” So if you are writing an application that needs >1500 octets, use an IPv6 implementation that supports >1500 octet fragmentation and reassembly. -David Borman > > (I also understand, that IPv4 fragmentation is much more flexible, yes. It can go as small as 68 byte packets.)