I support reclassification as proposed. Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: IETF-Announce [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > The IESG > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 12:40 AM > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: diffserv-chairs@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-rap-sppi@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-rap- > pr@xxxxxxxx; kmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib@xxxxxxxx; > rap-chairs@xxxxxxxx; bclaise@xxxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr- > pib@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-diffserv-pib@xxxxxxxx; ops-area@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Last Call: <status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic-00.txt> > (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI (RFC 3084, 3159, 3317, 3318, and 3571) > to Historic) to Historic > > > The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering > Group IETF (iesg) to consider the following document: > - 'Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI (RFC 3084, 3159, 3317, 3318, and > 3571) to Historic' > <status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic-00.txt> as Historic > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2016-02-10. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > >