Re: On IETF policy for protocol registries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 19/01/2016 9:04 PM, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2016-01-19, at 10:24, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Can DNS-SD tell you what path to query (along with server and port), in case the foo-speaking part of the server is nested within the regular port-80 web server?
>
> I'm not sure. But would you even need that? You can just make foo resolve to 80.
>

Because I might have strong reasons to make my service available under http://example.net/foo/ ... so I'd need a well known location that links to the relevant entry points under "/foo" -- be that special headers or markup in "/", or something in "/.well-known/", or something else.

At which point I'd have to ask, why not just use .well-known in the first place?

I'm assuming that either: the person minting the URL doesn't know my server setup (otherwise they could include the full path *and* the numerical port from the start, and skip the whole dance); or this is for resolving non-URL identifiers (like "foo:matty@xxxxxxxxxxx")


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]