comment on the proposed new note well
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: comment on the proposed new note well
- From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:31:09 -0500
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
I think the note well needs to make it clear that the patent policy
applies to _any_ discussion that might influence the decisions that an
author or wg or iesg makes about a document - whether or not it occurs
in a wg meeting or on a mailing list.
Also, patent infringement is not a matter of "awareness" since it's a
gray area. And someone should have to disclose a patent held by his
employer even if his employer isn't "sponsoring" his IETF participation.
I would say instead something like "if you have reason to believe that a
contribution to the IETF is covered by patents or patent applications
that are owned by, controlled by, or would benefit, you, your employer,
or your sponsor, you must disclose that fact, or not participate in any
discussion regarding the contribution with anyone who could influence
the content of the document or whether it is approved."
Keith
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]