Alexey,
My initial comment is that IP version 5 is already assigned to RFC 1190. See https://www.iana.org/assignments/version-numbers/version-numbers.xhtml for the current list of assigned IP version numbers. 2, 3, and 10-14 are currently available, and are assignable by IETF standards action. In the meantime, I suggest that you leave the version field TBD (to be determined), and just refer to your proposal as IPFF.
Cheers,
Andy
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Alexey Eromenko <al4321@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Good news: After much jumping through hoops I was able to decipher
what-it-takes to get my draft spec submitted (I still don't understand
it fully, though).
In seven parts.
1. Internet Protocol - Five Fields:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eromenko-ipff/
2. Internet Protocol - Five Fields: Addressing Architecture
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eromenko-ipff-addressing/
3. Internet Protocol - Five Fields: ICMP
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eromenko-ipff-icmp/
4. Internet Protocol - Five Fields: Link Address Resolution Algorithm
(ARP replacement)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eromenko-ipff-lara/
5. Internet Protocol - Five Fields: Mobile TCP (Mobile IP replacement)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eromenko-ipff-mops/
6. Internet Protocol - Five Fields: DNS extensions
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eromenko-ipff-dns/
7. Internet Protocol - Five Fields: UDP modification
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eromenko-ipff-udp/
Yeehoo ! Submitted !
-Alexey Eromenko "Technologov"