Am Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2015, 14:42:03 schrieb Alexey Eromenko: > I believe, that it is superior to both IPv4 and IPv6, simpler than > both, and intended as a replacement for both. Substantial improvement > on both. I think one main argument against "Five" would/will be it's "inefficiency" from a very first, historical and theoretical view onto it. IPv4 and 6 addresses fit "exactly" binary structures which are widely found in hardware (32/64bit) - but i know, the praxis could be more or less another story today... And if i read correctly, do you used the IPv4 specs widely and "just" added the "fifth field" / 8bits, which at least some of us still had in mind some times in the past too ß) Do you have any working setup or implementation anywhere? Or a small howto for implementing a own test bed with open source stuff? many thanks, Niels. -- --- Niels Dettenbach Syndicat IT & Internet http://www.syndicat.com PGP: https://syndicat.com/pub_key.asc ---
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.