That assumes that some of us believe that the RAI APP merger was a good idea in the first place. I do not believe it was a good idea. And reality seems to confirm my belief. On 12/8/15, 3:59 PM, "ietf on behalf of John Levine" <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider >>the following document: >>- 'Improving the Organizational Flexibility of the SIP Change Process.' >> <draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-02.txt> as Best Current Practice > >I've taken a look and generally support this draft, which brings the >DISPATCH WG model to the new combined RAI area. > >Two editorial requests: please give it a name that better reflects >what it's about, something like "Operation of DISPATCH style working >groups and the SIP Change Process." since it's about 95% about >DISPATCH and has only a few sentences saying SIPCORE still does >what it does. > >The other is just to update its contents: the merger of APPS and RAI >into ART has happened, and it is my impression from the Yokohama >meeting that DISPATCH still does what it does, and has absorbed some >of the chartering stuff that would otherwise go through APPSAWG. This >may not quite be right, but whatever we decided we're doing, it would >be nice if the draft described it. > >R's, >John >