Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-http-problem-01.txt> (Problem Details for HTTP APIs) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-12-01 12:38, Erik Wilde wrote:
On 2015-12-01 11:57, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2015-12-01 11:47, Erik Wilde wrote:
On 2015-12-01 10:58, Julian Reschke wrote:
Minor nit: the media type registration templates miss a few fields
defined in <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6838#section-5.6>.
i could only find one and https://github.com/mnot/I-D/pull/162 is adding
this last one. which other ones are you missing?
"Fragment identifier considerations:" ...

thanks, i added those to the existing pull request.

interestingly, when i looked at
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7303#section-9.1 to check which
information application/xml was specifying there, this registration
field was missing on the registration as well. same for
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7159#section-11 for application/json,
which also is missing such a registration field.

thanks and cheers,

dret.

Interesting. I was looking at the HTTP (RFC723*) registrations, and those had the new fields.

Best regards, Julian




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]