Dear Samir, all, Speaking as sergeant-at-arms. I think this topic and the attachment is out of scope for the IETF exploder. You’re also behaving with attacks to other participants, which can’t be tolerated. Furthermore, I don’t think crossposting to this list for a technical discussion is appropriate. So please don’t keep going on, read RFC3005, and avoid even responding to this email, so I don’t need to restrict your posting rights. Regards, Jordi -----Mensaje original----- De: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> en nombre de Samir Srivastava <samirs.lists@xxxxxxxxx> Responder a: <samirs.lists@xxxxxxxxx> Fecha: sábado, 21 de noviembre de 2015, 15:12 Para: ComKal Networks <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Asunto: Re: SPAM: - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs-05.txt> (Updated TLS Server Identity Check Procedure for Email Related Protocols) to Proposed Standard >This is not an spam. I am forwading the attachment to you. In which >supreme court of US did not do anything > >On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:05 AM, ComKal Networks <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 18:26:57 -0500 Samir Srivastava wrote: >> >>> Sorry I donot have time to change the subject. Can Protocol become >> >> Have the courtesy to at least place SPAM: at the start of >> your subject line please. >> >>