--On Thursday, October 08, 2015 06:01 +0000 l.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > The best place to raise this erratum for formal consideration > would be https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php Actually, Lloyd, probably not. RFC 2152 may be informational, but it is normatively referenced from a standards-track document. If an alteration or clarification to its definition is required, the fix really ought to have community consensus and the RFC errata process is not at all good for that. Those who are interested in ITF-7 and its applicability may want to see the related discussion on the apps-discuss list. john