Brian, > On Aug 3, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I've been watching several "WG adoption" threads since Prague, > and I have a question. > > Is it useful for authors of a draft to send messages saying things > like "I support the adoption of this draft as a WG document." ? > > I'm not asking whether it's right or wrong, just whether such > a message helps the WG Chairs in evaluating consensus. I think support is assumed by having their name listed as an author. So it would be redundant in my view. If an author said didn’t support adoption, that would be something to pay attention to. Bob > > (I see similar messages from non-authors, and I am definitely > doubtful about them unless they start with something like "I have > read this draft and...".) > > Brian >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail