On Jul 21, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, it’s certainly true that what we actually want is connect_to_name, not resolve_name_to_address+connect_to_address. |
On Jul 21, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, it’s certainly true that what we actually want is connect_to_name, not resolve_name_to_address+connect_to_address. |