Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
- From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:08:57 -0700
- In-reply-to: <20150714192438.1138.96059.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
This is clearly needed. There are serious technical, privacy and
personal safety costs to saying no to this, which supersede any supposed
layer 9 considerations. Given that the working group already discussed
the layer 9 issues and had consensus to publish this document, I think
it would be unfortunate and inappropriate to re-try all of the same
issues again on the IETF mailing list. If working group participants
feel that the consensus call was made in error, they should appeal the
consensus call using the IETF appeals process, rather than re-arguing
the same points on the IETF mailing list.
I say this with utmost respect and appreciation for the DNSOP working
group participant who has attempted to begin such an argument already. :)
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]