Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Call for comment: <draft-iab-doi-04.txt> (Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs)
- From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:39:03 -0400
- In-reply-to: <559F21E2.4070900@gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
OK, sorry to sound sarcastic, but this isn't a computer science issue,
or a matter of hurt pride over http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC2648 or
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kunze-ark/. It's simply what
the world uses.
"The world" uses URLs. There are, in addition to that, communities
that use DOIs, and communities that use URNs. And relative to the
expected useful life of either of the latter kind of names, only a tiny
amount of time has elapsed. These identifiers are intended to last
centuries, but have been around for less than 20 years. There's only a
tiny bit of buyin into either kind of name relative to their intended
scope.
Keith
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]