On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:49:26PM +0000, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > (I apologize for cross-posting) but it seems justified in this case) > > I find this work useful. > > I have two questions: > - why was not this document adopted by the NETCONF WG? Lack of time, out of focus, or are there any other (technical?) reasons? Why did it had to go on AD-sponsored and Experimental track? > - This work may potentially be useful for LMAP which has scheduling and time-stamping features in its architecture and framework. LMAP however just selected RESTCONF as their preferred protocol. What would it take to extend this work to RESTCONF)? (may be another piece of work) > LMAP deals with scheduling as part of the data model. I do not think that config changes are the way to model the start of measurements. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>