On 06/11/2015 05:57 PM, Larry Masinter wrote: > 1. Consider the possibility that some of the cases are deliberate trolling > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll#Corporate.2C_political_and_special_interest_sponsored_trolls I have thought over the years, that the WG chairs need to be a bit more aggressive when this or when aggressive posts continue. Personal attacks should be responded to by the WG chair with a private warning, then if they continue, banning them from the WG or all IETF lists. The banning step should be a public WG notice so that those directly effected and the observers that are often effected, know that it is being stopped and not tolerated. I have had another misrepresent my posts by non-clever editing (and flat out fiction) and drag out a WG for months. Its why I no longer post drafts. I almost had to file legal action to stop him. Fortunately his employer wanted no part of it and they stopped him. It was almost 5-years later when an AG told me they wished they had stopped him. Why not stop them when it happens? Is it a legal issue? -- Doug Royer - (http://K7DMR.us / http://DougRoyer.US) DouglasRoyer@xxxxxxxxx 714-989-6135
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>