On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Joe Abley <jabley@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 4 Jun 2015, at 3:45, John C Klensin wrote:
>> I also note that "PGP key signing parties" used to be a regular
>> feature at
>> almost every IETF meeting. If we were serious about secure
>> communications
>> (not just email) within the IETF community, we would reinstitute
>> those,
> For what it's worth, I am willing to volunteer for this. If there's a room and a timeslot available, I could do it in Prague, even. I've done lots of these in the past (although none at the IETF).
> Rewinding to reality, perhaps there are other PGP and/or CACert enthusiasts who would like to join in and talk about at least some level of PGP fumbling in Prague.
Since I'm more-or-less technically a "vendor" for the IETF, I try to stay out of the way as much as possible.> On 4 Jun 2015, at 3:45, John C Klensin wrote:
>> I also note that "PGP key signing parties" used to be a regular
>> feature at
>> almost every IETF meeting. If we were serious about secure
>> communications
>> (not just email) within the IETF community, we would reinstitute
>> those,
> For what it's worth, I am willing to volunteer for this. If there's a room and a timeslot available, I could do it in Prague, even. I've done lots of these in the past (although none at the IETF).
> Rewinding to reality, perhaps there are other PGP and/or CACert enthusiasts who would like to join in and talk about at least some level of PGP fumbling in Prague.