Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jun 4, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Tony Hain <alh-ietf@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The set of possible requests is inherently public information. Pairing a
> request length with the possible set of return lengths seriously reduces the
> set, and that is before you factor in who is being watched and what they
> might be looking for.

No.   RFC numbers are all the same length, except for the very early ones.   Plus, the headers in a request vary enough that it's unlikely that this attack would be as easy as you say; furthermore, https used for privacy is most effective at preventing passive attacks, and in this case the expense of doing the sort of analysis you are describing would be significant.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]