Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Mittwoch, 3. Juni 2015, 18:31:13 schrieb Cullen Jennings:
> The internet has already been harmed by too many years of security that is
> not turned on. 
If so - why not using signatures in YOUR mails btw.?

HTTPS x509 SSL/TLS isn't simply "security on" (this is btw THE major technical 
misunderstanding/-interpretation of HTTPS out today, leading to huge new 
scurity holes and attack vectors in practice) - this may be correct for i.e. 
with telnet->ssh or partly SMTP-> SMTPs/TLS (where it is still not applicable 
and/or applicated correctly until today in most practical cases), just btw...

> Take a hum at next plenary and find out if people want the IETF to actually
> use security or not.
...sorry, but This was NOT a question here - assume you mis- (or even not) 
readed correctly.


-- 
 ---
 Niels Dettenbach
 Syndicat IT & Internet
 http://www.syndicat.com
 PGP: https://syndicat.com/pub_key.asc
 ---
 



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]