On 6/2/2015 11:02 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Jun 2, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Leaving out the have-nots - or those whose access is blocked by others >> when content cannot be scanned - isn't moving forward. > > That would certainly be a problem if the consensus were not to > provide both a secure and an, as you call it, "open" version of all IETF documents. The IETF is more than just the documents. All IETF content should be accessible via non-secure means. Joe