Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF"
- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:13:41 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1472054.O9DP0qoCQf@gongo>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
Just to put on record: I disagree with Niels and agree with the IESG.
Encryption everywhere is good.
Once a connection is encrypted and certificate-protected, a whole class
of worries can be removed from the threat models; having fewer things to
worry about is great when designing protocol stacks.
The only issue I have with the document is that "great-cannon" is
spelled as "great-canon" once.
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]