>Isn't one way to deal with this to build additional mechanisms into the >draft submittal confirmation procedure? When I suggested this a couple of weeks ago, people pointed out that there are too many ways that the obvious approach, require all new draft authors to approve posting, has its problems. It can interfere with legitimate drafts (on meeting cutoff day one author stays at the office to finish the draft, the others take off for the weekend) and it's trivial to circumvent (use plausible fake webmail addresses.) We do automatically notify authors when new drafts are posted, which should usually alert surprised authors to the problem. R's, John