-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Den 27. mai 2015 00:44, skrev Jari Arkko: > >> aren't these things listed in the XML and this a 'quick' xml >> xoath parse away from win? > > Yes, they are in some cases… the difficulty with getauthors has > been the special cases. The non-XML… the non-numbered sections… the > oddly intended stuff… the misspelled stuff… people’s names in > different formats… the people who misspell their names :-) or at > least their co-authors names :-) > > You could of course say that we should ignore all that broken > stuff. I wanted to have a smaller error rate, hence included many > special cases. Almost all of this is data-driven, so once you add a > pattern line the tool will recognise it in the future. > > Anyway, I do have a set of tools that i really have no time to > maintain. This seems to be a common pattern among many of us :-) Would it be a Good Idea to put them up on github under a reasonable license? I've found that projects hosted on github seem to have a vastly lower barrier to entry for people who want to help than private projects, no matter how much they are made publicly available through other means. > One group of tools is getauthors/authorstats, the one that > collects document statistics. It is operational, but if taken over > by anyone else it needs a rewrite. Despite being somewhat data > driven, the rest of the code is a hack upon a hack. > > Another group of tools is the IESG statistics tools, which would be > very interesting, but are no longer operational due to interface > changes to how the data tracker presents itself. It too would need > a lot of work. > > If anyone is interested in putting time on these tools, let us > know! For instance, we could start with a Code Sprint project in > Prague. The IETF also runs official tools projects that are funded > with IETF funds. So far I have not considered these tools so > business critical that we’d need to have them done commercially. > And some of them have been up and running through community > effort, i.e., me, Lars, and a few people who have sent me edits. > Let me know if these are so critical that they’d need a more > official IETF attention. > > Jari > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVZYDFAAoJEGsBVt6Jonw0VtgP/jtegiaPSPhTpkHTG7YScSBX 4RYxADQ8ToHKKXRhPbKcTy5BruloKIr0WKdR9LEVzWOBunYD8tBPi2ojdYjP0h7l sm9pjBoLcGqy2QArx0Tt4iAysi9Sjlve2bGqWCEi4joX1yPFus7fD1UKkeDvzza3 /CTo5WOJbXLHVMn8vYG2q2uVerC6AqE4DKwUE1Pgtbg32F7XMuM42jru/YuRw6g2 uh9Nu57jLfgMMqE+jCgJgJbQ6I4OoZDxG61aF7HiCRoMDiR6D6nIOONnxqp7G4QV fA0kp13qzsJAXqu5HNhlSWQ6kIQSiObBytx0qhi/cd3xpfzc0NxSMgOi8uTEn2Li GrnCtTamTIGD8Zxfv0WNT8o9itdXJH/hpPmFLLftp3y+GyVGCx+t+iQgun5aL/UO syAqdIWe+eKdBwb0FaoNcU31hcp/Ldu/oMpJF3NUe9N+sHsBedrX8iSDhYF0W2XT lZwle4jagVwqc2b1pzp5YyMZCvBMskQ2Qyrq9ER4loTSSGblGWdslW56U7VWn/U2 soj9mPNJUPB4WgHKBCQcqxMPlw8+9HGDd2KrZbTQV0bV+aBnNV0EZPp2QdASWu3m Qra/Vfk0zvkHQGdbXjUG2689JXRb91vV1gvZ0O4JI6eirQ8XzwaGaxojaUE/hb0Q NAqEkScfew6VOk8RMC8/ =rc0R -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----